Filters
Global Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 3,919,109 | 3,756,935 | 667,465 | 17.766 % | | 3,087,933 | 82.193 % | 1,537 | 0.041 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 353,213 | 336,929 | 71,144 | 21.115 % | | 265,624 | 78.837 % | 161 | 0.048 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap in Denmark
| Country | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
 Denmark | 884 | 884 | 161 | 18.213 % | | 722 | 81.674 % | 1 | 0.113 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap for agent
| Occupation | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| agent | 303,406 | 291,798 | 63,267 | 21.682 % | | 228,377 | 78.265 % | 154 | 0.053 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap for agent in Denmark
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 873 | 873 | 155 | 17.755 % | | 717 | 82.131 % | 1 | 0.115 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap by year of birth for agent in Denmark
| Years of birth | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 1800 → 1809 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12.500 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 14 | 87.500 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1810 → 1819 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 24 | 100.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1820 → 1829 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11.111 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 8 | 88.889 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1830 → 1839 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 10 | 100.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1840 → 1849 | 23 | 23 | 4 | 17.391 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 19 | 82.609 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1850 → 1859 | 19 | 19 | 3 | 15.789 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 16 | 84.211 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1860 → 1869 | 25 | 25 | 3 | 12.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 22 | 88.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1870 → 1879 | 28 | 28 | 4 | 14.286 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 24 | 85.714 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1880 → 1889 | 31 | 31 | 6 | 19.355 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 24 | 77.419 % | 1 | 3.226 % |
|---|
| 1890 → 1899 | 34 | 34 | 3 | 8.824 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 31 | 91.176 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1900 → 1909 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 5.263 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 18 | 94.737 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1910 → 1919 | 23 | 23 | 3 | 13.043 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 20 | 86.957 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1920 → 1929 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 27.778 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 13 | 72.222 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1930 → 1939 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12.500 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 14 | 87.500 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1940 → 1949 | 39 | 39 | 8 | 20.513 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 31 | 79.487 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1950 → 1959 | 38 | 38 | 4 | 10.526 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 34 | 89.474 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1960 → 1969 | 67 | 67 | 12 | 17.910 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 55 | 82.090 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1970 → 1979 | 86 | 86 | 13 | 15.116 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 73 | 84.884 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1980 → 1989 | 99 | 99 | 18 | 18.182 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 81 | 81.818 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1990 → 1999 | 114 | 114 | 26 | 22.807 % | | 88 | 77.193 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 2000 → 2009 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 25.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 3 | 75.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 2010 → 2019 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 1 | 50.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
Denelezh