Filters
Global Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 3,771,182 | 3,600,917 | 631,643 | 17.541 % | | 2,968,061 | 82.425 % | 1,213 | 0.034 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 337,490 | 306,443 | 67,440 | 22.007 % | | 238,867 | 77.948 % | 136 | 0.044 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap in Denmark
| Country | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
 Denmark | 828 | 828 | 154 | 18.599 % | | 673 | 81.280 % | 1 | 0.121 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap for agent
| Occupation | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| agent | 293,600 | 271,649 | 60,894 | 22.416 % | | 210,625 | 77.536 % | 130 | 0.048 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap for agent in Denmark
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 817 | 817 | 148 | 18.115 % | | 668 | 81.763 % | 1 | 0.122 % |
|---|
[Japanese Wikipedia] Gender Gap by year of birth for agent in Denmark
| Years of birth | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
|---|
| 1800 → 1809 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12.500 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 14 | 87.500 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1810 → 1819 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 4.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 24 | 96.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1820 → 1829 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11.111 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 8 | 88.889 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1830 → 1839 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 9 | 100.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1840 → 1849 | 22 | 22 | 4 | 18.182 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 18 | 81.818 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1850 → 1859 | 18 | 18 | 3 | 16.667 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 15 | 83.333 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1860 → 1869 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 10.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 18 | 90.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1870 → 1879 | 24 | 24 | 4 | 16.667 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 20 | 83.333 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1880 → 1889 | 25 | 25 | 5 | 20.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 19 | 76.000 % | 1 | 4.000 % |
|---|
| 1890 → 1899 | 30 | 30 | 3 | 10.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 27 | 90.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1900 → 1909 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 5.556 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 17 | 94.444 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1910 → 1919 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 12.500 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 21 | 87.500 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1920 → 1929 | 17 | 17 | 5 | 29.412 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 12 | 70.588 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1930 → 1939 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12.500 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 14 | 87.500 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1940 → 1949 | 36 | 36 | 8 | 22.222 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 28 | 77.778 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1950 → 1959 | 34 | 34 | 3 | 8.824 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 31 | 91.176 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1960 → 1969 | 64 | 64 | 12 | 18.750 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 52 | 81.250 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1970 → 1979 | 79 | 79 | 12 | 15.190 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 67 | 84.810 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1980 → 1989 | 98 | 98 | 16 | 16.327 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 82 | 83.673 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 1990 → 1999 | 104 | 104 | 25 | 24.038 % | | 79 | 75.962 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 2000 → 2009 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 33.333 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 2 | 66.667 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
| 2010 → 2019 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 50.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 1 | 50.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
|---|
Denelezh