Filters
Global Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
| 3,767,941 | 3,595,958 | 630,850 | 17.543 % | | 2,963,899 | 82.423 % | 1,209 | 0.034 % |
[Latin Wikipedia] Gender Gap
| Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
| 27,885 | 27,858 | 3,073 | 11.031 % | | 24,770 | 88.915 % | 15 | 0.054 % |
[Latin Wikipedia] Gender Gap for poet
Occupation | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
poet | 2,109 | 2,109 | 204 | 9.673 % | | 1,904 | 90.280 % | 1 | 0.047 % |
[Latin Wikipedia] Gender Gap by year of birth for poet
Years of birth | Total | Total with gender | Females | % Females | Gap | Males | % Males | Others | % Others |
1800 → 1809 | 37 | 37 | 3 | 8.108 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 34 | 91.892 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1810 → 1819 | 50 | 50 | 6 | 12.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 44 | 88.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1820 → 1829 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 4.167 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 23 | 95.833 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1830 → 1839 | 30 | 30 | 4 | 13.333 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 26 | 86.667 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1840 → 1849 | 33 | 33 | 3 | 9.091 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 30 | 90.909 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1850 → 1859 | 39 | 39 | 3 | 7.692 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 36 | 92.308 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1860 → 1869 | 55 | 55 | 4 | 7.273 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 51 | 92.727 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1870 → 1879 | 63 | 63 | 8 | 12.698 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 55 | 87.302 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1880 → 1889 | 87 | 87 | 10 | 11.494 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 77 | 88.506 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1890 → 1899 | 93 | 93 | 9 | 9.677 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 84 | 90.323 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1900 → 1909 | 91 | 91 | 13 | 14.286 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 78 | 85.714 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1910 → 1919 | 102 | 102 | 18 | 17.647 % | | 84 | 82.353 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1920 → 1929 | 127 | 127 | 14 | 11.024 % | | 113 | 88.976 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1930 → 1939 | 109 | 109 | 20 | 18.349 % | | 89 | 81.651 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1940 → 1949 | 77 | 77 | 12 | 15.584 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 65 | 84.416 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1950 → 1959 | 59 | 59 | 11 | 18.644 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 48 | 81.356 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1960 → 1969 | 29 | 29 | 7 | 24.138 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 22 | 75.862 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1970 → 1979 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 36.364 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 7 | 63.636 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1980 → 1989 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 42.857 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 4 | 57.143 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
1990 → 1999 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 0 | 0.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
2000 → 2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | total under the threshold of 100 people | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
2010 → 2019 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.000 % | total under the threshold of 100 people | 1 | 100.000 % | 0 | 0.000 % |
[Latin Wikipedia] Gender Gap by country of citizenship for poet